Different frameworks ask different questions
The EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and DORA have different scopes and obligations. Start with the requirements applicable to your organization and use case.
Frameworks & evidence
AI governance becomes more useful when a framework requirement can be traced to a business owner, technical policy, review process and available evidence.
What to look for
The EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and DORA have different scopes and obligations. Start with the requirements applicable to your organization and use case.
A documented principle is more useful when reviewers can identify the assets in scope, the policy that implements it and who owns the control.
A request log, publishing approval and control review each answer a different question. Keep the links between them clear.
A practical approach
Identify the business purpose, supported assets, data and owners of the AI use case before applying a control set.
Reference relevant model, MCP, DLP and access policies so reviewers can see where a control operates.
Assign accountable owners and retain review snapshots and approvals. Revisit controls when workflows and access change.
Use configured request logs and administrative audit records to support review. Map evidence to the specific requirement rather than assuming that logging alone proves compliance.
Primary references
Review applicability and interpretation with your governance and legal teams.
This guide describes governance practices and product use cases. It is not legal advice, a certification or a guarantee of regulatory compliance.
The product path
See AI Warden in action
Bring your models, tools and security requirements. See how AI Warden puts them under one control plane.